Alaska Airways is suing a mechanics union in federal courtroom over a latest arbitration choice that reversed the 2022 firing of a technician who examined constructive for THC. The corporate alleges the arbitration board that rendered the choice earlier this month “acted in extra of its authority by allotting its personal model of commercial justice.”
The five-page criticism, filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court docket for the Western District of Washington, says the board reinstated the employee, Gregory Chappell, “based mostly on a sequence of findings and conclusions that have been wholly unsupported by reality or cause.”
In feedback to Marijuana Second on Friday, the lawyer who represented the mechanics union at arbitration, Lee Seham, mentioned it’s “extraordinarily unusual” for corporations to problem arbitration choices in federal courtroom, noting that such awards are sometimes thought-about closing and binding.
The dispute facilities on a random drug check given to Chappell on July 5, 2022. After it got here again constructive for marijuana, the employee denied utilizing hashish and mentioned he was unaware of how the THC would have entered his system.
“I don’t smoke weed,” he instructed an Alaska Airways upkeep director in an investigatory interview on the time, in line with the arbitration choice, which says Chappell “denied utilizing marijuana or different medicine, and couldn’t clarify the constructive drug outcome apart from speculating he might have unwittingly ingested a marijuana edible at a block celebration/barbecue he had lately attended.”
In reversing Alaska’s termination of Chappell, who lives in Washington State, the arbitration board referenced an earlier scenario through which the airline allowed one other upkeep technician to return to work after he self-reported consuming a marijuana-infused cookie by mistake.
In the end the arbitration panel determined that Alaska Airways didn’t have simply trigger to terminate the worker, as is required underneath union legislation. One supervisor, for instance, admitted he didn’t “particularly” talk about with anybody that the employee had denied deliberately utilizing marijuana.” As a consequence, one other airline supervisor testified, “we didn’t see any cause to pursue unintended ingestion as a result of that wasn’t provided as a possible cause” for the failed check.
“Simply trigger is a broad idea that means equity,” Seham, the lawyer who represented the fired employee, instructed Marijuana Second after the arbitration award. “If somebody says, ‘I’m harmless,’ and also you don’t even examine to the slightest diploma his arguments, then you haven’t complied together with your obligation to supply them each procedural and substantive due course of.”
However in its newly filed lawsuit, Alaska Airways says the board “acted in extra of its jurisdiction and authority as a result of the award lacked basis in actual fact or cause, didn’t draw its essence from the [collective bargaining agreement], and amounted to allotting its personal model of commercial justice.”
“The Board ordered Mr. Chappell’s reinstatement,” it says, “as a result of it decided that the Firm’s disciplinary choice ‘might have been one thing apart from termination’ had Mr. Chappell’s ‘potential unintended ingestion idea’ been introduced throughout that assembly.”
Noting that the courtroom has authority underneath the Railway Labor Act to dismiss the arbitration award, Alaska Airways is asking for the reinstatement choice to be vacated.
Counsel for the Alaska Airways, Joe Wonderly, a accomplice at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
Seham, in the meantime, instructed Marijuana Second on Friday that he’s optimistic in regards to the employee’s possibilities within the face of the corporate’s lawsuit. “The win fee, with out exaggerating, is about one in a thousand,” he mentioned of comparable challenges to arbitration awards.
The evolving authorized panorama round hashish in america has sophisticated drug testing requirements, particularly in federally regulated sectors, and has inspired employers and policymakers alike to rethink when and the way persons are screened for marijuana.
Earlier this month, the Home Guidelines Committee blocked renewed makes an attempt by a Democratic congressman to finish the observe of drug testing federal job candidates for hashish use.
However in September, nevertheless, the Home Oversight and Accountability Committee handed a standalone bipartisan invoice that may stop the denial of federal employment or safety clearances based mostly on a candidate’s previous marijuana use.
Whereas rescheduling of marijuana to Schedule III underneath the Managed Substances Act might finally permit use of medical marijuana by some federal staff—even in states the place it’s at the moment unlawful—individuals who work as federal contractors or grantees would seemingly not see a coverage shift. Underneath federal legislation governing public contracts, contractors might not possess or use a “managed substance,” outlined as any drug in Schedules I via V.
Final week the Substance Abuse and Psychological Well being Companies Administration filed federal drug testing program guidelines modifications clarifying that utilizing medical marijuana underneath a physician’s advice in a authorized state is just not a sound excuse for a constructive THC check.
Learn the total federal courtroom complaint under:
Picture components courtesy of rawpixel and Philip Steffan.