When hashish opponents communicate out towards hashish they incorporate quite a lot of speaking factors, with some extra ridiculous than others, such because the “hashish hangover” declare.
It appears some opponents will do or say absolutely anything to painting hashish negatively.
In an instance of the hypocrisy that usually accompanies anti-cannabis propaganda, very hardly ever do those self same hashish opponents name for an finish to alcohol gross sales on account of hangovers.
Whereas there’s ample proof alcohol use can lead to hangovers, researchers in Australia have discovered that the identical will not be true for hashish (regardless of what hashish opponents might declare.)
Beneath is extra details about it through a information launch from NORML:
New South Wales, Australia: The vast majority of accessible knowledge fails to assist claims that hashish might probably influence both cognitive perform or topics’ efficiency of security delicate duties 24 hours after consumption, based on a review of the scientific literature printed within the journal Hashish and Cannabinoid Analysis.
A crew of Australian researchers reviewed knowledge from 20 research involving 458 topics. Chosen research assessed topics’ efficiency 12 to 24 hours following THC dosing.
Investigators did not determine any proof of so-called THC-specific “next-day results” in 16 of the 20 research reviewed.
They concluded: “A small variety of lower-quality research have noticed detrimental (i.e., impairing) ‘subsequent day’ results of THC on cognitive perform and safety-sensitive duties. Nonetheless, higher-quality research, and a big majority of efficiency assessments, haven’t. General, it seems that there’s restricted scientific proof to assist the assertion that hashish use impairs ‘subsequent day’ efficiency.”
Authors additional opined that the imposition of office drug testing insurance policies that detect the long-term presence of cannabis metabolites and impose sanctions upon those that take a look at constructive for them are arguably not justified by the accessible knowledge.
This text first appeared on Internationalcbc.com and is syndicated right here with particular permission.